Total Pageviews

Sunday, 8 January 2017

Betsy Christison Victims advocate or cyber bully?


Marie McGrath has been monitoring the Facebook page "The Anti Breedism Alliance" & sharing posts back to her hater mates over in the pit bull hate group "The Pit Bull Propaganda Machine Revealed" 

Marie McGrath
January 6 at 7:35am
And so did every human, pet & livestock that was taken off this earth by beasts like this. But they never got that chance.
Like
Comments
Lisa Padgett Reputation among uneducated people? Tell that to the police that have to deal with them every day and see the carnage.
Like6January 6 at 8:11am
Kay Patterson And those who work in emergency rooms and morgues.
Like1January 6 at 4:03pm
Ron Schwarzott I always love the way they shape the argument it's the way the dogs looks and not the genetics
Like5January 6 at 8:18am
Aaron B Wood of course. Nutters pretend that genetics don't exist. It's all in how te dog looks and how it's raised
Like5January 6 at 8:22am
Kay Patterson Form follows function but don't try to tell the nutters that.
Like1January 6 at 4:03pm
Nathan Barrett That way they can frame it as just like racism, which is a conversation ender in modern society. People are scared of seeming racist, which, to be fair, in most cases, is a good thing.
Like2January 6 at 8:14pm
Lisa Padgett It's really a pathetic argument.
Like3January 6 at 11:37am
Steen Jensen ...bullshit, pits and such shit do not deserve another chance, whatsoever
Like22 hrs
Betsy Christison They deserve a chance to compete and survive just like any creature.. but we don't bring them into our HOMES and let them live FREELY with our children and family members and then deny that they are dangerous! We eliminate them when they invade our living space or we take antibiotics to kill them when they infect our bodies. I mean think of this scenario .. a picture of a brown recluse spider sitting on the couch next to an infant and the caption says "OH he's SO dangerous LOL... my SWEET cute spindly little spider would never hurt anyone! ".. The next moment it bites the child and he gets a flesh would so bad his leg has to be amputated. Would anyone defend that person for allowing a highly toxic spider to have access to a baby? OF course not! But when it comes to pit bulls, all reason goes out the window.
Like113 hrs
Laurie Miller Musselman Well, I am educated, so they are the ones that need to educated. Don't pull this stupid stuff on us! We educated ones can see right through their stupid B.S.! What idiots to insult the intelligent ones that we are! We want to keep humans safe. They want to lie!
Like11 hrs
Betsy Christison What is ironic, is that DATA is what educated people actually rely on... pitters rely on emotions and irrational rhetoric.
Like1 hrEdited


Considering the nature of Betsy's posts to this group I find her comment (the last comment on the previous post) particularly ironic check out some of her posts below to see what I mean.....




Betsy Christison
January 5 at 1:41pm
From our local newspaper...love all the positive media coverage... NOT! (Click on the photo to read the caption.. he's heading for his grandmother's house!)
Like


Please follow the link and report her post featuring this child that's being used without the parents consent while you are there please report anything else you think shouldn't be on Facebook & the group.

 If you follow this link it'll take you straight to the post.


Betsy Christison
14 hrs
Disgusting... I posted a comment saying this is the most irresponsible thing I've ever seen.

(This picture I've used has been adjusted to block out the infants face whereas Betsy's post has the child's face visible)



Betsy Christison Just noticed it's an old page.. but hopefully others will still see it like I did and question why anyone would allow a baby to be put in that kind of danger.
Like3Yesterday at 10:27
Joy Bailey Pitiots! 😜
Like3Yesterday at 10:35
Picture owner What danger y'all are dumbasses if you think that dog will hurt that baby
Like8Yesterday at 10:39
Sarah May A 2-month-old boy was killed Sunday afternoon and his mother was injured when the family’s pit bull attacked the child inside their Dallas home, police said.

Police said a man left his son — later identified as Brayden Wilson — alone with the dog as he went outside to turn on their sprinkler system at their home on the 6800 block of Beechnut Street.

When the man walked back into the house, the dog was attacking the child as he sat in a bouncing chair, police said.

The dog then attacked the boy’s mother, biting her twice.

In a scene almost too sickening to imagine, a 2-month-old baby in a bouncy seat was attacked and fatally mutilated by the family’s pit bull.

The baby’s grandmother expressed the family’s complete shock. The dog had been in the family and around other children for eight years without problems, she said.

Read more: http://www.daxtonsfriends.com/.../brayden-lamar-wilson.../
Like8Yesterday at 10:57
Gwendolyn Hanan Oh but pibbles is SMILING!!! Just look at sweet pibbles!!!
Like4Yesterday at 13:21Edited
Betsy Christison Well of course I got 3 PMs overnight from Pitters following my comment on the OP! So glad they want to learn the truth about their dogs! Ok, maybe they just want to confront, deny and abuse me.. HAHA!!
Like515 hrs
Dana X Steven Renfrow These people honestly feel assured of their pit bull's safety. They see nothing wrong with their goofy, affectionate pet, not when so many "animal rights" groups try to downplay, deny, and distort the sad truth. Did their child survive? Well, good. That's so great, but meantime across the country other people who felt the same way are suddenly horrified when that same pit bull that lovingly played with their child has suddenly gone predatory and won't let go of the child's face. As a parent, you must look at all the facts. Is it possible for a pit bull to not harm a child? Sure, but does that matter when severe harm or death is possible still? Would any mom want a pit bull near their child knowing there is no way of knowing how it will act, even when it spends years being gentle and sweet? We really need to CDC to warn the unknowing, deceived public. Until that happens, this will keep happening. How sweet, how cute, a big pit bull being sweet with a baby. It will go viral! Other parents will attempt this. Many, many more children will be crippled for life or killed.
Like712 hrsEdited
Dana X Steven Renfrow Scars from what? Pit bulls disfigurement?
Like15 hrs
Dana X Steven Renfrow Hannah Honey, care to oblige? I am a bit preoccupied atm.
Like15 hrs
Amy Luongo they were able to reattach the war with leaches
Like2 hrs
Amy Luongo 250 stiches
Like2 hrs
Betsy Christison the media screams about all kinds of so called 'dangers' that are in our world and because of political correctness refuse to address the dog one.
Like512 hrs
Marie Clara MacKenzie Kiraly Hide! You might get Ebola or killed by a chihuahua!
Like112 hrs
Betsy Christison Think of how many car seat warnings are put on the news.. or peanut allergy alerts or videos of kids pulling a book shelf over on top of themselves or a million other unlikely things that could happen if you aren't a 'responsible parent'. but NEVER have I seen any statistical, fact based report about pit bulls.
Like411 hrsEdited
Marie Clara MacKenzie Kiraly Betsy Christison well, they media wouldn't dare because they know they'd be eaten alive by the nutter machine
Like511 hrs
Betsy Christison Yep! exactly right. It literally takes like FIVE minutes to get attacked by them if you even post a comment that makes any negative remark about them.
Like511 hrs
Gwendolyn Hanan THE CDC IS PART OF THE PROBLEM
Like412 hrsEdited
Heather Clemenceau I think most of those are assumed risks. Where I live daycares are regulated. Breathing the air? Like we have other options?
Like47 hrsEdited
Betsy Christison Cody.. the deal is that some risks in life are necessary to functioning and living in our world, and some are arbitrary....in other words, there is no downside to NOT taking that risk. If owning a dog that has a demonstrated higher probability of attacking and maiming or killing a human being is a risk you want to take with YOURSELF... then that is your business. But unfortunately you live in a family with other people, including small children, and a community of neighbors and others in your city who can and still may be harmed seriously by your choice to own a pit bull. The statistics and unpredictability are the issue here. Your dog has not hurt you in the time you've had him. That does not in any way reduce the fact that your dog COULD turn on your child in one second. Or it would go after the next person who comes into your house. Why not own a dog that cannot kill someone?
Like34 hrs
Cody Luis Avila Because there is not such law or regulation that states I can't
Like4 hrs
Betsy Christison Why do you want to take that risk?
Like4 hrs
Betsy Christison What is it about these dogs that makes a person like you with small children decide that it is more important to have THAT breed of dog than another one, knowing that it can easily kill a child as well as an adult?
Like24 hrs
Sarah May An article on the psychological characteristic of vicious dog owners has just appeared online in the compelling academic publication, The Journal of Forensic Sciences, finding that those who who own dangerous dogs are more likely to endorse antisocial and psychopathic character traits and more likely to report criminal behaviour.

The study was led by psychologist Laurie Ragatz who collected data from 869 college students who completed an anonymous online questionnaire assessing type of dog owned, criminal behaviors, attitudes towards animal abuse, psychopathy, and personality.



http://mindhacks.com/.../psychological-characteristics.../
Like44 hrs
Betsy Christison The intact male pitbull is almost always a symbolic extension of the male owner's ego... the guy on my street with the aggressive one fits that description EXACTLY. He has so much invested in his hard ass "f*** you world" attitude that the dog merely serves to inflate his image even more.
Like32 hrsEdited
Betsy Christison Cody Luis Avila Why don't you answer my question? Saying that it is not against the law is a dodge... why would you choose to put your kids at risk? Children are killed by pit bulls every single week somewhere in the world... they are NEVER killed by many many other breeds of dog.
Like24 hrsEdited
Amy Luongo I always post -great "before" pics!
Like23 hrs
Amy Luongo call CPS. they take this as dangering the welfare of a child. especially if I'm a city or state with bans.
Like23 hrs
William Johnson I'm not sure if Cody left on his own, or if another admin removed him but he's a breeder.
Like62 hrsEdited
Betsy Christison OMFG.. of course...
Like23 hrs
Betsy Christison who cares about children when you're raking in big bucks.. Wonder how many of his puppies will end up getting euthanized in shelters... horribly irresponsible to breed these dogs.
Like43 hrsEdited
Amy Luongo "self employed" baha no.
Like33 hrs
Amy Luongo
Like23 hrs
Sarah May Does he pay taxes?
Like33 hrs
Laurel Davis I can't reconcile this with the fact that he claimed that HE is a responsible pibbles owner--LOL. No one responsible is breeding more unwanted pitbulls to fill our landfills.
Like53 hrs
Lisa Padgett a lot of years ago. Maybe it was a one-off. IDK
Like43 hrs
Betsy Christison Sarah Well, he should claim the income on his tax return!
Like22 hrs
Sarah May But laws don't apply to pitters...
Like22 hrs
Amy Luongo I can say hep messaged me and was very polite!
Like154 mins



 As you can see Betsy brags about getting messages from "pitters" as she calls her victims, I've spoken to the child's mother and she has asked Betsy to remove her picture and was blocked by Betsy.

 Now I've grabbed these 2 comments from the thread at the head of the page just to make a point as these comments feature breed specific legislation advocates using one of their main tools the disinformation that pit bulls attack because of their fighting heritage "it's in their genes" is their main catch cry.......


Ron Schwarzott I always love the way they shape the argument it's the way the dogs looks and not the genetics
Like5January 6 at 8:18am
Aaron B Wood of course. Nutters pretend that genetics don't exist. It's all in how te dog looks and how it's raised
Like4January 6 at 8:22am


I've never heard a bigger load of garbage in my life and here's why 

A. If pit bulls attack because of their fighting genes how do Bsl advocates explain away the 128 dog bite related fatalities involving non pit bull type dogs between 2005-2015. ( Source - dogsbite)

B. If all pit bulls attack "it's only a matter of time before their genes kick in and they go pit" Bsl advocates regularly claim whereas according to dogsbut there's been an average of 23 deaths per year throughout 2005 to 2015 alleged to have involved pit bulls considering there's an estimated pit bull population of 4-6,000,000 million pit bulls doesn't that kind of blow their logic clean out of the water?

C. The fact that over 30 breeds and types of dogs have been involved in fatal attacks and the majority have no fighting heritage in their ancestry also confirms the "it's in their genes" argument is utter nonsense.

All the studies done by legitimate reputable animal organizations in many different countries all concur that breed plays little part in dog bite related fatalities with far more complex issues at play and to try and blame a breed is simplistic and naive to say the least by banning a "specific" breed you only can hope to prevent "specific" victims.

All the leading organizations world wide out rightly reject breed specific legislation in favor of breed neutral owner specific legislation.


more to come.....


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)