Total Pageviews

Friday, 26 May 2017

When pit bull haters attack featuring "Mad Dog McGrath"


It all starts with posting a picture on Facebook regarding an "accident" between your son and the family pet in the backyard suddenly you are attacked and called a bad parent including allegations of "child abuse" by fanatical crackpots in pit bull hate groups.

Now here's the picture in question.....




Now I have seen injuries like this before and there was no attack involved and it most likely was a collision between the child and the pet as there is none of the trauma and bruising normally associated with bite wounds however since being made aware of this attack in this group on her and her family she's not responding to inquiries.

I monitor these hate groups and inform these victims when their privacy is being abused in this manner and as you can see by the comments screen shot from the hate group involved they're doing what they normally do and that's jumping to conclusions without any evidence and making complete asses of themselves typically.

This post is in "the pit bull propaganda machine revealed" and this is the type of conversation you'll find there first we have Marie McGrath's narrative attacking this parent but generally not making a lot of sense although her hate is quite clear.



As you can see Marie doesn't make a lot of sense but her fellow haters don't need her to make much sense obviously as they jump straight on the crazy train.....




As you can see for yourselves they dramatize and sensationalize everything Peggy's rant about the child's face being ripped off which clearly wasn't the case but they're obviously starving for legitimate material to use in their hate campaign against both pit bulls and their owners.

And you can bet they all trolled her Facebook page searching for more pictures of her pit bull and more so called evidence of this parent endangering her children with her pet.





And as you can more haters turn up and it turns into a feeding frenzy type attack on this poor family and this isn't the first time they've done this as this is "normal operating procedure" for this pit bull hating fanatics they also stalk shelters and rescue alike even going as far as contacting potential adopters and trying to talk them out of adopting dogs.

I sincerely advise pit bull owners to be careful when and where they share pictures of their pets on the internet as these people are out there just waiting and trolling searching for anything they can find to use in their twisted diabolical extinction campaign against pit bulls.

If you've found yourself to be a victim of these parasites please contact this Facebook page, "The Anti Breedism alliance" and the volunteers there will be only to happy to assist in any way they can in relation to dealing with these people.


more to come.....

Sunday, 21 May 2017

Pit Bull Haters support recklessly endangering neighborhood children and the killing of pets.....


You may or may not have heard to story about "Pacman" the family "pit bull" (mix) who was shot from a second story window by a neighbors in close proximate to his 10 & 11 year old owners.




The shooter claims that "Pacman" was attacking their pet which was in the yard too unleashed and was playing with "Pacman" according to the children.




Numerous 911 reports were received and all the callers reported gun shots one saying there was 7 gun shots, the only person claiming their was a dog fight is the shooter and his wife while there's been no evidence of a dog attack presented in this incident at this time.




Now typically you average pit bull hater can't resist grabbing a story like this and using in their smear campaign against pit bulls posting it across their hate groups and pages while ridiculing both the owners and the victims.

One group called "Pit Bull Awareness Day" has posted this story with their own nasty twist blaming the victim and refuting the clear and present danger these type of actions such as discharging a fire arm in a built up area present to the community.




Just in case you can't see it clearly this is the narrative accompanying the post......

"“We just shot a dog that was attacking our dog,” the wife of the shooter said. “There were two little kids out there trying to tear them apart and they were going to get hurt.”


After police arrived, the neighbor claimed his dog was being bitten on the throat. He said he did not have time to get dressed after a shower, and that’s why he fired his 22 pistol from the window."






Now as previously mentioned these pit bull hating types take every advantage of stories like this generally victim blaming and stalking victims often sharing their private pictures which some times include children.




Now you may ask yourself what type of person engages in this type of behavior and that's easily discernible upon witnessing this type of so called victims advocacy as they all seem to hate pit bulls more then they care for any victims.

The exception to the rule seems to been Nicholas Valentine he supports breed specific legislation but doesn't seem to engage in the gutter tactics all the others employ.




Now as you can see Denny Olson tries to justify/defend the actions of the shooter and considering he hasn't posted anything on Facebook since January 2016 he obviously only uses social media to defend pit bull shooters.

Then Peter Grenier chimed in with his comments blaming the parents of the children for the incident claiming the children should be removed from their home.

Now Peter is your typical pit bull hater breed specific legislation supporter and if you check out his Facebook page you'll see exactly what I'm talking about as he has 2 posts on his wall, this one regarding a city council delaying a vote on whether to repeal Bsl in January this year (2017)



Link to post.....peter.grenier.33/posts/10211808081942726:0

The only other post on his wall in years is a change of his cover picture so it's same to say that Peter only uses social media (Facebook) to launch hate attacks on pit bulls.

Suzanne Gilmore Taylor arrives and goes straight on the attack claiming it wasn't a dog fight it was an "attack" rant rant rant etc etc in true anti pit bull culty style.



Suzanne vigorously defends the shooters actions reinforcing the claims their pet was attacking the neighbors dog in spite of the complete lack of any evidence supporting such claims made by the shooter and his wife.




Unlike most other Bsl supporters Suzanne actually seems to be using her social media for it's intended purposes as well as hating on pit bulls and their owners.


Then an individual more representative of the entire group arrive with making comments we've become accustomed to in relation to the majority of the people that support breed specific legislation firstly there's Jennifer Bryant Spring.




As I've said Jennifer was more in line with the majority of these so called victims advocates with her comment celebrating the death of a "pit bull" regardless of the circumstances.





And lastly was Denny Olson caps it off with a comment that speaks to the real mindset of your typical pit bull hater they claim to be acting in the best interests of the community whereas their day to day behaviors expose their real intention and motivations.

A petition has been created to try and encourage the Law Director to pursue charges against this shooter for the reckless endangerment of these children and the murder of their beloved pet.

Link to petition..... change.org/p/lawdirector-mountvernonohio-org-justice-for-pacman-the-gunned-down-pit-bull-and-his-family


more to come......