So now Jeff is even accusing the American Bar Association of being part of or influenced by the mythical "highly funded pit bull lobby" and as you can see his followers are swallowing it hook line and sinker.
The irony runs deep in the Dj and his definition of what constitutes "bias' is typical of all his assertions and claims in relation to pit bulls which are polluted by his need for vengeance against the breed in spite of the fact the dogs involved in the alleged attack on his son were actually "boxer " mixes.
Strangely Jeff claims that his son being killed by "boxer " mixes makes him an expert on "pit bulls' and dog bite related fatalities in general but his claims of being a public safety or victims advocate are quickly discredited by his support for breed specific legislation which ignore all the victims of non pit bull type dogs.
As you can see by Jeff's post he's not an advocate or an expert, he's a hate & revenge driven father grieving the loss of his son in all the wrong ways why else would he be supporting legislation that does nothing to prevent another 128 victims to non pit bull type dogs in the next decade too (that's one victim each and every month for the last ten years do we want another 128 in the next decade too?).
What, no mention that Ledy VanKavage, also a board member of Animal Farm Foundation, steered the ABA Animal Law Committee from 2010 to 2012 as the chair (also chair-elect) and heavily influenced it?
No mention that jurisdictions with well-written BSL have a 100% success record in high courts?
You just can't stop your deceptive tactics, can you Jane?
Animal Farm Foundation
The American Bar Association recently issued a letter to lawmakers in Montreal to express their professional concern about Montreal's proposed Breed Specific/Discriminatory Legislation.
"In 2012, the ABA adopted a resolution urging all levels of government to adopt comprehensive breed-neutral dangerous dog/reckless owner laws that focus on the behavior of both dog
owners and dogs. The resolution further recommends the rejection and repeal of any breed discriminatory laws for the following reasons:
owners and dogs. The resolution further recommends the rejection and repeal of any breed discriminatory laws for the following reasons:
● Breed discriminatory laws may violate due process protections...
● Breed discriminatory laws are ineffective at improving public safety...
● Breed discriminatory laws are expensive and difficult to enforce...
● Breed discriminatory laws infringe on the property rights of responsible dog owners and unfairly impact low-income families..."
● Breed discriminatory laws are ineffective at improving public safety...
● Breed discriminatory laws are expensive and difficult to enforce...
● Breed discriminatory laws infringe on the property rights of responsible dog owners and unfairly impact low-income families..."
Read the full letter, which does an excellent job of laying out the facts about the many failures of BSL, here:
The true irony is Jeff and his followers accuse the NCRC and AFF of being "bias" and as such call for any information tendered by these organizations to be rejected because the "seem' to favor pit bulls. (another words they use real facts from real studies and this chaffs Jeff's butt)
The irony lays in the fact that Jeff considers himself not to be "bias' even though he's publicly expressed a wish to feed neighborhood pit bulls anti freeze and publicly declared war on pit bulls the day of his sons attack.
The true bewilderment for me though lays in the fact that law makers, councils and judges all seem to be fooled & take their propaganda and try and use it as legitimate data whereas it's little more then amateurish data gathering from media reports and correlation undertaken by a washed up journalist with absolutely no schooling in such area of expertise dogsbite's own "site terms" section clearly states they're not professionals?
more to come.....
No comments:
Post a Comment