Pit bull advocate talking point number 679
"Media reports are unreliable and not scientific."
From the CDC report in 2000. JAVMA September 15, 2000. Breeds of Dogs involved in fatal attacks in the United States 1979 to 1998. Page 836. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsaf…/…/dogbreeds-a.pdf
Procedure-
We collected data from The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and MEDIA accounts related to dog bite attacks and fatalities, using methods from previous studies.1-3 The HSUS maintains a registry of human DBRF, including date of death, age and sex of decedent, city and state of attack, number and breeds of dogs involved, and circumstances relating to the attack. To supplement HSUS reports, as in the past, a database was searched for accounts of human DBRF that occurred in 1997 and 1998. Our search strategy involved scanning the text of NEWSPAPERS and PERIODICALS for certain words and word combinations likely to represent human DBRF followed by a review of articles containing those terms. Data obtained from HSUS and NEWS accounts were merged to maximize detection of human DBRF and avoid duplicate reports. One new human DBRF from 1996 was identified in the 1997 and 1998 reports and was added to the existing data for 1996."
Here's why most people consider dogsbite to be the true pit bull propaganda machine and coupled with the fact there's not one actual animal expert involved tends to confirm peoples suspicions?
"Debunking Dogsbite"... about 9,160 results
Unethical Website of the Month: Dogsbite.Org | Ethics Alarms
petition: Investigate Dogsbite.org and CEO
DEBUNKING DOGSBITE
I hope that clears up why we think Dbo is a scam run by an ex phone line psychic with absolutely no credibility in the animal world for you Jeff?
more to come.....
No comments:
Post a Comment